Many agree that educational opportunities should be available to every child. No matter what their gender or socioeconomic status may be, children deserve every chance to succeed.
The benefit of requiring school uniforms in a learning environment is that it reflects this equality. Instead of having children focus on the brands they wear or the fashion they can afford to create cliques, they can focus on their learning environment instead. The disadvantage of requiring school uniforms is that it puts a cost on parents, guardians, and school districts that is often considered to be unnecessary.
Here are some of the additional school uniforms pros and cons to consider as well. There is no pressure on the student to decide what they should wear each day. Because a school uniform limits the options a student has for clothing, there is less pressure to get through the morning routine. This often allows students to sleep a bit more because less time is required to get ready. Many school uniform policies still allow for individual taste, allowing for different colors or outfits, such as the inclusion of skorts or jumpers in addition to pants.
The costs of uniforms can be managed. Although the cost of a uniform can be difficult on some families, it can often be managed. Many schools which require one specific daily uniform can purchase clothing in bulk, saving money for disadvantaged families. PTA buy-back programs, fundraisers, crowdfunding, and community supports are often in place to help with the costs as well. Student attendance is better in schools with uniform policies.
When there is a mandatory school uniform code in place, statistics show that student attendance rises. This is because classrooms become more disciplined and orderly, allowing students to evaluate themselves instead of evaluating how they compare to their peers. The uniformity that is created lessens tensions, bullying, and violence that can occur in schools, which improves attendance. It becomes easier to identify trespassers. When students are required to follow a specific dress code, it becomes much easier to identify people who may not be allowed on campus.
If an intruder is wearing something different that the school uniform, they stick out like a sore thumb when surrounded by students and teachers who are following the dress code. If a class is on a field trip, then it becomes easier for teachers and school administrators to quickly identify the children who are with the group.
This lessens the risk of having a child go missing. School uniforms create an automatic age identification. School uniforms automatically identify children as being a student.Did you go to a school that required uniforms? Do your kids wear school uniforms now? If so, check out our guide to the pros and cons of school uniforms. Check out our student loan calculator. One argument used in favor of school uniforms is that when kids wear uniforms visible class markers between rich kids and poor kids are decreased or eliminated, which may lead to more social mixing along economic lines.
Uniforms, this argument goes, add to a sense of disciplined learning in school. Uniforms may also build community in a school as students of all ages — and alumni, too — bond or commiserate over the outfits they all associate with their school days.
ADVANTAGES AND DISAVANTAGES OF THE SCHOOL UNIFORM
In areas where students may be gang-involved, uniforms can increase safety by preventing students from wearing clothing that declares — intentionally or inadvertently — gang affiliation. Keeping a child in school uniforms may be more expensive for parents and guardians than buying regular clothes would be. Often, uniforms are only available from a limited number of suppliers and the lack of competition and captive market keeps prices high.
Or, a uniform will include pricier items like blazers and dress shoes, which some families might struggle to afford. Teenagers in particular are famous for needing to express their emotions and their tastes in music, fashion and art through clothing, hair and piercings.
School can be tough on kids and teens as it is, without taking away one of the few areas where they can exert some control and express themselves, say opponents of school uniforms. Some uniforms may strike students and parents as sexist.
For example, if a uniform requires girls to wear skirts and pants are not allowed, some students and parents may object, leading to conflict with the school administration. And if students are sent home for uniform violations, they will miss valuable learning time.
Plus, policing student uniforms takes time and effort on the part of administrators. If back-to-school shopping in your household involves shopping for a school uniform, you might be familiar with some of the arguments for and against uniforms. By some accounts, school uniforms are becoming more popular in the U. First you answer a series of questions about your situation and your goals.
Then the program narrows down thousands of advisors to up to three local fiduciaries who meet your needs. You can read their profiles to learn more about them, interview them on the phone or in person and choose who to work with in the future.
This allows you to find a good fit while doing much of the hard work for you.Brunsma, who has studied and researched data related to school uniforms for 15 years, disagrees. He finds that the requirement to wear uniforms has no impact on students A mother of one in Nashville supports school uniform policies.
Tiffany Palmer's School uniforms make up 1 billion in back-to-school sales. Now that we have heard the arguments on both sides, what do moms really think about this debate? The Pros and cons of kids wearing uniforms in school: Some parents are already thinking about what school they will send their child to this fall.
Uniforms have always been a debate, and there is a great discussion for the pros and cons The pros and cons of school uniforms: If your child is like 19 percent of American kids in public schools, he or she must wear school-mandated uniforms to class each day. For years, private and religious schools required students to wear uniforms, while students at most public schools simply High School Football: Mt.
Whitney Preview: Whitney remodeled the metal shop on campus into a state-of-the-art high school football facility They came back with a PowerPoint presentation for Martin to view, outlining the pros and cons of the situation. This PowerPoint presentation is going to discuss the different pros and cons of the use of school uniforms. School Uniform Could School Uniforms - SlideShare: The controversy of having school uniforms really comes down to the pros and cons of having school uniforms and school and what positive attributes will Let's take a quick look at school uniforms pros and cons.
There's no distracting fashion show at school when you wear a uniform. School Uniforms: pros vs. Uniforms Improve Academics "Putting on the school uniform signals he or she is going to school just like dad dresses PowerPoint PPT presentation Uniforms in Schools: Background of the Debate The introduction of school uniforms for public schools into Pros for Having Pros for Having Uniforms Cons of In the 's public schools were often compared to Here is a useful presentation about This video Post a Comment.
File Size: x pixels bytes. The pros and cons of school uniforms Brunsma, who has studied and researched data related to school uniforms for 15 years, disagrees.One of the first schools to implement the uniform policy in the United States was the Cherry Hill Elementary School in Baltimore in It was believed that school uniforms increased the safety of students of the Long Beach District, since the schools in the area noted a decrease in school violence after implementing the uniform policy.
Class attendance also improved tremendously. Inthen-president Bill Clinton endorsed the implementation of the uniform policy in public schools. He argued that it would promote discipline among the students and lead to a decrease in school violence. The number of schools based in cities that required their students to wear a uniform was higher than that of schools from the rural and suburban areas. More people have joined the support for the introduction of the uniform policy in public schools.
Proponents for mandatory school uniforms cite increased safety of students as the major reason why more public schools should implement the policy.
This is key to dealing with them before they can put anyone at risk or cause damage to the school property. Offenders could no longer hide weapons in baggy clothes to school under the guise of being students. Cases of sexual assaults also dropped tremendously.
Every school has a set of uniforms that is unique to them and has its badge or logo emblazoned on the chest. This can be used to identify students as belonging to a given school. In the event that a child gets lost on their way to or from school, whoever finds them can easily be able to reunite them with their loved ones by taking them back to their school, from where their family can be traced.
Students who sneak out during school functions or run away from school can also be easily identified by the local authorities. Students come from different socio-economic backgrounds. Naturally, some are more privileged than others. Clothes, being fashion items and a status symbol, could make children from poor backgrounds vulnerable to bullying from privileged ones. On the other hand, students who come from higher-income families and thus can afford higher quality clothing may also become targets for robbery and theft from other students.
Enacting the uniform policy would level the playing field for all students and minimize chances of bullying based on socio-economic status. Wearing the same colors to school instills a sense of belonging and pride among the students. If the students are from a school with a rich history, they will be proud to wear the badge and will want to represent the school positively.The prevalence of uniforms in public schools continues to rise in the United States, as parents and school administrators exert efforts to create safe environments in our schools.
Fueled by these statistics, more schools across the country are requiring uniforms in their public schools, naming school safety as their primary motivation. Even with these compelling statistics, however, there are other statistics that argue that uniforms are not as beneficial as school administrators and parents are encouraged to believe. Opponents cite research that shows a lack of individualism and comfort among students, working to actually decrease student learning and success. Thus, the question still remains: are public school uniforms good for your child?
Many school administrators and parents believe that uniforms create a better learning environment at school. First and foremost, many administrators claim that students are not as distracted by how they look, and therefore, spend more time learning at school. This allows students to focus more on their schoolwork, rather than social appearances. In addition, with the visual uniformity present across all students, the instance of school pride has increased.
Similar to athletic team uniforms, proponents argue that dressing cohesively increases pride, unity, and a renewed commitment to the school.
With uniforms, a more professional tone is set in a school, encouraging students to take their studies more seriously. Uniforms at school also reduce the prevalence of violence, which is a major concern for many public schools. Outsiders who do not belong on campus are easily identified, and thus, do not pose a great threat to the students.
A school may only allow green or yellow polo shirts and khaki bottoms, for example, preventing students from wearing the traditional gang identifying colors of red and blue. Accessories such as bandanas, another distinguishing gang clothing characteristic, can also be eliminated from the school dress code. When it is more difficult to identify members of gangs in school, the fights and violence between rival gangs decrease. By denying students the opportunity to fully express their unique personality through the clothing they select, individualism is unable to develop to its fullest capacity.
When children select their own clothing, they are able to develop confidence and independence, characteristics vital to personality development and adult success. Controlling the socialization process could harm the student as an adult, as they are not prepared for the real world, where they will indeed be judged by their appearances.
Proponents of uniforms argue that they will bring conformity among students, resulting in increased safety, but when students are limited through what they may wear, they will find other ways to react against authority and the limits uniform policies place on their individual nature.
Without the outlet of expression in their clothes, students may turn to other avenues of self-expression that may be viewed as even more inappropriate than clothing, such as nontraditional hairstyles or make-up or more importantly, acting out against school and parental authority through the decisions they make and behaviors they exhibit.
In addition, opponents argue that uniforms may not be comfortable for all students, which will limit learning as students worry about their appearance. Student comfort is important in order to maximize learning outcomes, and uniforms may stymie academic focus. For example, the uniform standard may require students to wear polo shirts that are tucked into khaki slacks. Students who are overweight may feel very self-conscious about their bodies. Additionally, female students may feel insecure about their bodies and feel that having a tucked in shirt will bring attention to their developing figures.
When students do not feel comfortable in the required school uniform, their focus will shift from learning. Children, especially those in middle and high school, are constantly concerned about their appearance, and wearing a school uniform will not alleviate this concern.Should students have to wear school uniforms? The debate goes on in schools and at homes. With most American public schools nowadays enforcing the wearing of uniforms inside schools, teachers and parents are weighting whether a uniform policy is necessary or not.School Uniforms Are SO AWKWARD!
Let us take a look at the arguments on both sides of the coin. Helps enforce positive behavior. Educators and experts who support that school uniforms should be implemented argue that uniforms contribute positively to the behavior of students. They believe that students feel more professional and feel like they belong to something when they wear school uniforms, encouraging them to behave accordingly as a result.
In addition, distracting fashion trends and status -symbol clothing are eliminated, enabling students to focus more on their academic goals. Or in other words, there is less focus on fashion in the classroom and more on learning.
Makes morning easier for parents. When there is no debate on what students are allowed to wear to school, then mornings would be extra easier for parents.
This means decreased morning arguments as everyone knows exactly that the only dress to wear is the regulated school uniform. Creates a sense of school spirit. Experts who support the school uniform policy believe that wearing uniforms can help develop a stronger team mentality among the student body. Also, as it evens the playing field, there is decreased bullying and teasing related to clothes. Controls dress code. With uniform school policy, things like modesty issues, gang colors, offensive text on shirts and the like are eliminated.
It is cheaper. Buying a new school wardrobe every class opening can be hard on the budget. Whereas with uniforms, parents only need to buy a few pieces of school uniforms every year or when needed.
After all, uniforms are designed to stand up repeated washings, so it is much more economical. Leaves extra budget for stylish weekend clothing. With parents able to save money from not having to by everyday clothes for school, parents can afford and can choose to have their children wear fashionable and branded clothing on weekends. Not only that, as students wear uniform the entire weekdays, they might be able to appreciate their weekend clothes more.
Limits self-expression. This has always been the major argument raised against school uniforms. Critics believe that forcing kids to wear uniforms to school limits their personal expression. They argue that kids lose their self-identity when they lose their right to freely express themselves through personal fashion. High initial cost. Although we pointed out earlier that school uniforms are more economical compared to buying a school wardrobe, critics argue that it can be costly to buy several uniforms at once.
Also, there are many other types of uniforms parents are required to buy aside from the everyday uniform. There are also the P.Print article. For the past decade, schools, parents and students have clashed over the issue of regulating student attire.
Incases involving an anti-Bush T-shirt in Vermont, an anti-gay T-shirt in San Diego, and Tigger socks in Napa, California, made their way through the courts, causing many to wonder whether this debate will ever be resolved.
Meanwhile, researchers are divided over how much of an impact — if any — dress policies have upon student learning. A book makes the case that uniforms do not improve school safety or academic discipline. A study, on the other hand, indicates that in some Ohio high schools uniforms may have improved graduation and attendance rates, although no improvements were observed in academic performance.
Pros and Cons of School Uniforms
In the s, public schools were often compared unfavorably to Catholic schools. Noting the perceived benefit that uniforms conferred upon Catholic schools, some public schools decided to adopt a school uniform policy.
Generally, dress codes are much less restrictive than uniform policies. Sometimes, however, dress codes are nearly as strict, as in the case of a middle school in Napa, California. In August ofthe district announced it would relax its dress code — for the time being — to allow images and fabrics other than solid colors. The district superintendent, while admitting that banning images on clothes raises concerns about the restriction of political and religious speech, announced his intention to move soon toward implementing uniforms in the district.
Uniforms are certainly easier for administrators to enforce than dress codes. Consider two recent examples of students challenging dress codes through the courts. The school had suspended the student, not for the anti-Bush political statement, but for violating a dress code that prohibits drug and alcohol images.
The school argued that the T-shirt was hateful and inflammatory. Check with your school to see what the dress code is, as they can be fairly specific. In Tulsa, Oklahoma, for example, the dress code prohibits:.
One school might require white button-down shirts and ties for boys, pleated skirts for girls and blazers adorned with the school logo for all.
Another school may simply require that all shirts have collars. In Toledo, Ohio, elementary school students have a limited palette of colors that they can wear: white, light blue, dark blue or yellow on the top half and dark blue, navy, khaki or tan on the bottom half. Toledo girls are allowed a fairly wide range of dress items, however: blouses, polo shirts with collars, turtlenecks, skirts, jumpers, slacks, and knee-length shorts and skirts. Boys have almost as many choices: dress shirts, turtlenecks, polo or button-down shirts, pants or knee-length shorts.
Virginia Draa, assistant professor at Youngstown State University, reviewed attendance, graduation and proficiency pass rates at 64 public high schools in Ohio. At least at these schools, they do. I was absolutely floored. She was unable to connect uniforms with academic improvement because of such complicating factors as changing instructional methods and curriculum.